From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Feb 13 21:50:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA22877 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 13 Feb 1999 21:50:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA22871 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 1999 21:50:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id VAA09950; Sat, 13 Feb 1999 21:50:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 21:50:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199902140550.VAA09950@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: John Baldwin Subject: Re: ports/10025: latest Wine port doesn't need two of the patchf Reply-To: John Baldwin Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/10025; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: se@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/10025: latest Wine port doesn't need two of the patchf Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:42:05 -0500 (EST) On 13-Feb-99 Stefan Esser wrote: > On 1999-02-11 04:55 -0800, jobaldwi@vt.edu wrote: >> >Description: >> The Wine port failes to patch unless the patch files patch-ap and patch-av >> are removed. Once they are gone it builds fine and runs fine, as far as I >> can tell. > > The patches have been removed when I did the commit. > > Which method did you use to update the Wine port on > your system ? > > Regards, STefan I track the CVS repository nightly from cvsup3.freebsd.org via CVSup and update /usr/ports nightly after the sup finishes. --- John Baldwin -- http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/ PGP Key: http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message