From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 15 22:38:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51A3585 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C07EE2DEA for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VA6Bg-0005Jk-R8 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:38:36 -0700 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:38:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1376606316815-5836490.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5FAF1B.1080102@freebsd.org> References: <4F5FAF1B.1080102@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: will 9.2 be called 'diehard'? or maybe Naktomi? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:38:45 -0000 Well, that took me by surprise... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/will-9-2-be-called-diehard-or-maybe-Naktomi-tp5562525p5836490.html Sent from the freebsd-hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.