From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Aug 25  5:36: 5 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from vax1.baker.ie (VAX1.baker.IE [194.125.50.91])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1784B14CF0
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 05:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cillian@baker.ie)
Received: from baker.ie ([194.125.50.55]) by vax1.baker.ie with ESMTP;
          Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:39:25 +0100
Message-ID: <37C3DF76.710D03D5@baker.ie>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:20:06 +0100
From: Cillian Sharkey <cillian@baker.ie>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carl Mascott <cmascott@world.std.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is soft updates in 3.2-R still alpha? (REPOST)
References: <199908251221.IAA00280@europa.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Is soft updates in FreeBSD 3.2-R still considered alpha?
> (That's what the README says, but the README is quite old.)
> Is it not yet recommended for general use?
> Thanks!

I've been using it on a few FreeBSD servers and have experienced
no problems related to it (soft-updates)

Cillian


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message