From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 10 10:19:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from midget.dons.net.au (daniel.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.137.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1C414F7C for ; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 10:19:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Received: from dons.net.au (guppy.dons.net.au [203.31.81.9]) by midget.dons.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA15935; Sat, 11 Sep 1999 02:48:40 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Message-ID: <37D93D65.627AD43@dons.net.au> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 02:48:29 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" , Boris Popov , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetWare client in -current References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be > > mount_nwfs because building it without the kernel source could be a > > problem, but the rest of it could be a port I think :) > Thats like suggesting we make the 'ipfw' command a port and leave the > kernel bits in the tree. Since all this stuff depends on being in sync, > the only reasonable way to do this is to put it in the tree. Why? What kernel code does this need? --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message