From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Jan 28 13:49: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.ham.muohio.edu (dragon.ham.muohio.edu [134.53.141.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1D914FBE for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 13:49:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from howardjp@wam.umd.edu) Received: from localhost (howardjp@localhost) by dragon.ham.muohio.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16276; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:01:24 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: dragon.ham.muohio.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:01:24 -0500 (EST) From: Jamie Howard X-Sender: howardjp@dragon.ham.muohio.edu To: Szilveszter Adam Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another advocacy opportunity In-Reply-To: <20000128183947.A30631@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > This is fine, I just thought that if a first-time reader reads this they > will not find it "sufficient" when compared to the number of professional > developers in a big company. Also, since people were remarkably receptive > for the -IMHO a lot messier- Linux mode of developing things, and it went > down well- i.e businesses were not afraid to deploy Linux in the enterprise- > I thought they would also receive our model well which not just looks like a > big deal but is a big deal because it combines open-source type grass-roots > activism with professional review to create a superior product which > businesses can depend on (Gosh I already sound like Steve Ballmer at a > press-briefing:-) I'll find someplace where I can use this later :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message