Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 13:12:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When (not) to enter a repo-copy in ports/MOVED Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.61.0409041311480.99539@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <1094149616.740.31.camel@gyros> References: <Pine.BSF.4.61.0409021258000.99539@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <1094149616.740.31.camel@gyros>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > No. You only need a MOVED entry if one port is being removed, or if > users of one port should move to using another port for the same > functionality. Since both ports are going to coexist, you can forgo a > MOVED entry. Okay, thanks for the clarification! Mark also responded and said he'll have a look at clarifying the documentation. Gerald -- Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.61.0409041311480.99539>