From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 12:53:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A5B3CC2; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A41B27C2; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.21] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118E3438BD; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 07:53:16 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53B6A3AA.9000904@marino.st> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:52:58 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r360609 - in head/security: arpCounterattack bioapi courierpassd courierpasswd courieruserinfo cracklib cvm distcache distcache-devel dmitry doorman doscan fbopenssl fsh fswatch fwipe f... References: <201407041246.s64CkB1g040352@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201407041246.s64CkB1g040352@svn.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:53:40 -0000 On 7/4/2014 14:46, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Author: bapt > Date: Fri Jul 4 12:46:11 2014 > New Revision: 360609 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/360609 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r360609/ > > Log: > Resetting maintainership on ports that have not been staged and without any > pending PR (related to stage) One of those belonged to mono@. Should ports maintained by teams be included in these resets? I would think mono@ would be disbanded before resetting mono ports. John