From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Mon May 29 18:26:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73DBD7D2F7 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:26:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D597B84DA4 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:26:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4TIQWEG093595 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:26:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219606] aarch64: libarchive.so.6 not present, libarchive.so not equivalent @ 318898 Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 18:26:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: prj@rootwyrm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 18:26:33 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219606 --- Comment #4 from Phillip R. Jaenke --- I certainly won't disagree there; it's a terrible idea. It's also what they= 're going to do, whether or not you or I like it. What's an even WORSE idea is = the fact that nothing is throwing an error here. At the MINIMUM something shoul= d be screaming. Neither libarchive nor pkg should just sit there and go 'oh, somebody did a bad symlink, I'll just corrupt silently.' That also does not address the fact that there is no possibility of having a libarchive.so.6 on aarch64 currently. Once a user goes to r318898 or later, their existing installation is going to get hosed in one way or another. At= the minimum, aarch64 needs COMPAT_FREEBSD11 to build and install libarchive.so.= 6 to prevent blowing up pkgbase. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=