From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Oct  1 05:48:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA15590
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 05:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA15577;
          Tue, 1 Oct 1996 05:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.7.6/8.6.9) id WAA27507; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 22:35:14 +1000
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 22:35:14 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199610011235.WAA27507@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au
Subject: Re: Your UserConfig changes for unmasking PCI devices...
Cc: bde@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> I'm leaning that way myself unless we can figure out a way of doing
>> a better job.  How about a one-line summary somewhere like this:
>> 
>> 	PCI device support for:  bt0 ed0 lnc0

Good.

>Ah, how about putting off calling userconfig() until after the PCI and
>EISA probes?  Since it's only _really_ relevant to the ISA probe
>process, shouldn't it be directly associated with it?

Bad.  It should become relevant to configuration of everything.

Bruce