From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 21:00:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E443A16A4DF for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:00:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail006.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail006.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC8A43D3F for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:00:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) i5TKxPx26277; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:59:26 +1000 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])i5TKxPVd067813; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:59:25 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost)i5TKxPZF067812; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:59:25 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:59:25 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Alex Keahan Message-ID: <20040629205924.GS1596@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <34301.1088242340@critter.freebsd.dk> <200406261336.26051.alex@hightemplar.com> <20040626125907.5b5b3ae7.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <200406261945.03932.alex@hightemplar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406261945.03932.alex@hightemplar.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:00:11 -0000 On Sat, 2004-Jun-26 19:45:03 +0300, Alex Keahan wrote: >The Java source code is available. The source code to Solaris 8 has >also been available for several years now. Ok, so it's not BSD-licensed, >but it's certainly good enough to find the proper remedy to improve the >failing SVR4 compatibility code instead of axing it. Given the current SCO vs everyone else legal battles, anyone who works on OSS should probably think very carefully about looking at the Solaris 8 source code. -- Peter Jeremy