From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jun 3 11:40:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA15276 for current-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 11:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA15271 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 11:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA27469; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 19:39:43 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199706031839.TAA27469@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Julian Elischer cc: current@freebsd.org, brian@awfulhak.org, archie@alpo.whistle.com, Ari Suutari Subject: Re: Libalias probably broken In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Jun 1997 19:20:50 PDT." <33937F82.2F1CF0FB@whistle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 19:39:43 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I just realised that libalias was *probably* broken by the ipfw > changes I imported last night, as the method of controlling ipfw > has changed. > > I'll get archie to have a look. I'd be surprised if there are any problems. The libalias stuff is standalone - you pass it a packet and it fondles it and gives it back. The only possible changes are with the natd instructions (I've cc'd this to Ari, the author). I'll take a look and pass back any mods to Ari. > julian -- Brian , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....