From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Oct 25 16:45:32 1995
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA00340
          for stable-outgoing; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 16:45:32 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA00326
          ; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 16:45:26 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA08033; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 16:34:54 -0700
To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
cc: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk>, stable@freebsd.org,
        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Oct 20 snap install... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Oct 1995 18:18:20 CDT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.951025180953.227B-100000@fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu> 
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 16:34:54 -0700
Message-ID: <8031.814664094@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I don't like the terminology `Active' because if a user does not know the
> difference between active and passive, it does not provide any useful hint
> about which FTP option to use.  Saying just `FTP' and `Passive FTP' gives
> an obvious, and probably correct, choice to users who don't know what
> `Passive FTP' means. 

I'm inclined to agree, actually.  It always struck me as awkward the
way it was worded before.  Changed!

					Jordan