From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 2 20:43:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id UAA28378 for current-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 20:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA28363 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 20:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1) id E0vg1Tg-0004nC-00; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 21:43:32 -0700 To: "John S. Dyson" Subject: Re: Area codes in na.phone... Cc: current@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Jan 1997 23:37:30 EST." <199701030437.XAA12339@dyson.iquest.net> References: <199701030437.XAA12339@dyson.iquest.net> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 21:43:31 -0700 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've gone ahead and committed the changes that I have, which brings me up to date with the phonebooks that I have laying around the house. All the changes through Oct 19, 1996 have been included. Please check na.phone for errors, especially in your local georgaphic area and submit them back to me. People have already found one or two of them, and those will likely be corrected soon. In message <199701030437.XAA12339@dyson.iquest.net> "John S. Dyson" writes: : We have a change in Indiana (765) I think on 1Feb97. If you want -- I : can check it out and add it. Actually, if you could send me a patch, I'll commit it after 1Feb97 when it goes into effect. There is already one patch pending for the western half of Long Beach that happens in about 3 weeks. More generally, should there be "coming soon" annoations in the file or not? My personal preference is to keep things simple and what works today, but that isn't a strong preference. Warner