From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 00:45:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F84C16A4D5 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:45:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955D143E4B for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:45:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B6846B09; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:45:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 01:45:45 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Matthias Schuendehuette In-Reply-To: <1E0ACFEC-A232-4818-9175-E6D181D63DA0@snafu.de> Message-ID: <20050722014135.N16902@fledge.watson.org> References: <1121917413.4895.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050721113927.T97888@fledge.watson.org> <1E0ACFEC-A232-4818-9175-E6D181D63DA0@snafu.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quality of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:45:51 -0000 On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > Am 21.07.2005 um 13:00 schrieb Robert Watson: >> >> Have you tried, and do you plan to try, our 6.0 test releases before >> 6.0-RELEASE goes out the door? Specifically, on the hardware you know >> you're having problems with 5.4 on? > > Yes, I did - see the thread "mpt + gvinum on 6.0-BETA". > > But I'm a bit disappointed, that until now there's not *one* reply on my > report. > > It's new hardware, which doesn't even boot with 5.3/5.4-RELEASE (but > with 5.2.1 :-) and probably a more popular Server (FUJITSU-SIEMENS RX300 > S2)... > > what was my fault here? Should I post to -current instead? I would post to -current about 6.x issues, as it's not yet considered a -STABLE branch. If it's an mpt problem, the likely contact is Scott Long (scottl@), who most recently did cleanup and bug fixing of mpt (July 10). Lukas Ertl (le@) is probably the starting contact of choice for gvinum issues, although there's also a geom mailing list which might be a good place to send e-mail. It could, though, easily be an interrupt-related problem of some sort -- e-mail with Scott should hopefully quickly determine if it's the driver, an interrupt problem, or a problem that should be in the hands of Lukas. Robert N M Watson