Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 14:05:44 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: Jos Backus <Jos.Backus@nl.origin-it.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: testmain -> ficl ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9901081404120.21487-100000@korin.warman.org.pl> In-Reply-To: <3695BE8B.C4EDB7B4@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Jos Backus wrote: > > > > Since we have it in the tree anyway, would it make sense to always > > build/install testmain and install it as, say, /usr/bin/ficl? Perhaps that > > would encourage some people to start fiddling with it, e.g. to enhance the > > /boot stuff? > > I'd have prefered a userland loader... :-) What do you mean? The only thing that comes to my mind is an emulator of the real bootloader, so that you could test things. Well, userland bootloader -> KLD is kind of one. Andrzej Bialecki -------------------- ++-------++ ------------------------------------- <abial@nask.pl> ||PicoBSD|| FreeBSD in your pocket? Go and see: Research & Academic |+-------+| "Small & Embedded FreeBSD" Network in Poland | |TT~~~| | http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ -------------------- ~-+==---+-+ ------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9901081404120.21487-100000>