From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jun 30 2:40:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.welearn.com.au (phoenix.welearn.com.au [139.130.44.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D0914C04 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:40:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sue@phoenix.welearn.com.au) Received: (from sue@localhost) by phoenix.welearn.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.0) id TAA01159; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:40:31 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <19990630194026.02734@welearn.com.au> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:40:26 +1000 From: Sue Blake To: Jesus Monroy Cc: Konrad Heuer , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [FreeBSD Man Pages] References: <19990630092816.5964.qmail@nwcst021.netaddress.usa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <19990630092816.5964.qmail@nwcst021.netaddress.usa.net>; from Jesus Monroy on Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 02:28:16AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 02:28:16AM -0700, Jesus Monroy wrote: > Konrad Heuer wrote: > > > > To my mind *one* of the points where FreeBSD is really good are the man > > pages. I don't have a proposal how to use this fact for promoting > > FreeBSD, > > but my intention is to mention that strength of FreeBSD here. > > > Very incorrect. Just a few days ago I show that 15% > of the online whatis(1) and man(1) records where > incorrect. For one definition of "incorrect". What you showed does not detract from the point that Konrad is making. -- Regards, -*Sue*- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message