Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:      David Daugherty <doc@wcug.wwu.edu>
To:        Alan Batie <batie@aahz.passedge.com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: semaphores
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000627105628.13686B-100000@sloth>
In-Reply-To: <20000627102330.49662@aahz.passedge.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Alan Batie wrote:

> I get:
> lockfile(1) - conditional semaphore-file creator
> ipcrm(1)                 - remove the specified message queues, semaphore sets, 
> and shared memory segments
> semctl(2)                - control operations on a semaphore set
> semget(2)                - obtain a semaphore id
> semop(2)                 - atomic array of operations on a semaphore set
That's really unusual. I would have thought that the implementation of
semaphores would have been part of the posix standard. Maybe not, I'm
still a Unix/BSD newbie.

David
Software Engineer - NetManage
Work email: david.daugherty@netmanage.com
Home email: doc@wcug.wwu.edu
ICQ 21106703
Washington State Resident



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.96.1000627105628.13686B-100000>