From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 13 01:12:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA86106564A; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D24A8FC13; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p7D1Cw7Q018905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:12:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p7D1CwJh018904; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA19182; Fri, 12 Aug 11 18:00:58 PDT Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:00:52 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: dougb@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4e462f34.M0MwnBU6a9phTeTQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20110810060822.GZ60956@droso.net> <4E42E7F4.5040502@gmail.com> <201108111920.p7BJKGjc021859@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <4E44AEED.7070207@gmail.com> <4E45B36B.8050207@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E45B36B.8050207@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, kworr@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ports-i386@freebsd.org: linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r181.34 failed on i386 9] X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:12:59 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/11/2011 21:41, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > > I'm talking about stability here. Adobe silently shipped > > another version and our port become unbuildable because > > distfile wasn't available anymore. > The correct answer to this problem is to update the affected > ports. That certainly is the correct mid- and long-term solution to any given occurence. It still leaves the port broken from the disappearance of the previous distfile until the maintainer has time to update the port. That is likely to be a not-insignificant length of time, because we cannot reasonably expect port maintainers -- who are usually volunteers -- to drop everything in order to immediately fix this sort of problem.