From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 11:43:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5841016A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:43:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (A17-250-248-97.apple.com [17.250.248.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7148D43FCB for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:43:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lomion@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id hAKJhUpd027418; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.100] (bgp585760bgs.jdover01.nj.comcast.net [68.39.198.236]) (authenticated bits=0)hAKJhTPd015180; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:43:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20031120111512.D3A36E4A01@mail.freesurf.fr> References: <23740.216.195.235.103.1069277586.squirrel@webmail.gigguardian.com> <20031119224613.GI66785@submonkey.net> <20031119221537.O731@ganymede.hub.org> <388284A0-1B27-11D8-A469-000393A335A2@mac.com> <20031120103000.GM66785@submonkey.net> <20031120111512.D3A36E4A01@mail.freesurf.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Lawrence Sica Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:43:26 -0500 To: ogautherot@freesurf.fr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org cc: Chip McClure Subject: Re: SCO Lawsuits, round 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:43:31 -0000 On Nov 20, 2003, at 6:15 AM, ogautherot@freesurf.fr wrote: > > Ceri Davies =E9crit: > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:00:27AM -0500, Lawrence Sica wrote: >>> On Nov 19, 2003, at 9:16 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Ceri Davies wrote: >>>> >>>>> "I agree that the more yarn you pull out the more you see," = McBride >>>>> said >>>>> during a press briefing at the inaugural Enterprise IT Week at=20 >>>>> cdXpo >>>>> Conference here. "We have enough sorted out, but we are so focused=20= >>>>> on >>>>> the [IBM litigation]. With our limited energies and what our guys=20= >>>>> are >>>>> going through, we probably won't file any suits against BSD until >>>>> sometime in the first half of next year." >>>> >>>> Um ... who is BSD? *scratch head* Or do they intend to sue = Berkeley >>>> themselves? >>> >>> The various *BSDs and Apple one must assume. Apple is probably a >>> prime target. >> >> Well Apple aren't using a BSD kernel as I understand it, so they're >> probably safe. >> >> Ceri >> >> --=20 > > Darwin (the new Apple kernel) is based on BSD so, eventually, the Mc=20= > Bride > could sue them too. > The kernel is Mach based, the userland is BSD based though. --Larry=