From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 13:32:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from actionbase.se (xanadu.actionbase.se [195.67.32.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCE337B491 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from henrik.localdomain ([192.168.1.242]) by actionbase.se (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id WAA04929; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:09:12 +0100 Received: from henrik.localdomain (IDENT:henrik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by henrik.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA18981; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:28:00 +0100 Message-ID: <3A8998CF.5DB47E53@hem.passagen.se> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:27:59 +0100 From: Henrik Nordstrom X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wilson Cc: technical@pmburg.co.za, Dennis , FreeBSD Mailing List , squid-users@ircache.net, technical@sai.co.za Subject: Re: [technical] Transparent proxying with delay pools based on IP precedence bit References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org You can have differen delay_pool settings for different traffic classes, and use delay_access to select the appropriate pool. The question is how to select the appropriate pool... -- Henrik Nordstrom David Wilson wrote: > Yes true ! I believe that Squid really works well with delay pools but how > do we discriminate and limit our clients international bandwidth separately > from their Local bandwidth, which is sold to them at different prices, and > at the same time allow them to reap the benefits of using a transparent > Squid cache on our network ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message