From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb 29 10:57:36 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA29861
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:57:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sumter.awod.com (awod.com [198.81.225.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA29853
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:57:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Ken (tsunami.awod.com [198.81.225.31]) by sumter.awod.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA14342 for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 13:57:23 -0500
Message-Id: <1.5.4b11.32.19960229185927.006cd2bc@awod.com>
X-Sender: klam@awod.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4b11 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 13:59:27 -0500
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Ken Lam <klam@awod.com>
Subject: Re: 100-baseT hub recommendation?
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

At 08:27 AM 2/29/96 -0800, rcarter@geli.com wrote:
>
>I've used TrendNET 100BASE-TX hubs and Bay Networks 28115 switch
>without problems.  Grand Junction (3Com now?) hubs are known to
>work, but Asante hubs had a cooling problem initially, might be
>fixed now.

Yes.  I just received our Cisco (GJ) Catalyst 2800 with 8 port 100BT.
Works like a charm.  But of course, it is a switch not a hub.

-Ken