Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 23:54:15 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>, Orit Moskovich <oritm@mellanox.com> Subject: Re: softirq and tasklets Message-ID: <20130522235415.25a43240@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <519D28F6.10109@FreeBSD.org> References: <981733489AB3BD4DB24B48340F53E0A55B0D3CB1@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> <519D28F6.10109@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 May 2013 23:22:14 +0300 Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > on 22/05/2013 15:37 Orit Moskovich said the following: > > Hi, > > > > Is there an equivalent concept for Linux softirq and tasklets in > > FreeBSD? If not, what will be the "closest" way to implement them? > > With the takqueue taskqueue_swi which executes its tasks in the > > context of an interrupt? A filter routine or interrupt thread > > defined in bus_setup_intr...? > > This is an odd mailing list for the question. > > Not necessarily, maybe he's porting an existing Linux project that makes use of these features (like epoll => kqueue). -- Michael Gmelin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130522235415.25a43240>