From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 5 00:10:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-threads@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C3216A4DE for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2454C43D45 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k750AMPT071831 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:10:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k750AMOw071830; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:10:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:10:22 GMT Message-Id: <200608050010.k750AMOw071830@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org From: David Xu Cc: Subject: Re: threads/101355: threaded application spents too much time in _umtx_op with libthr X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Xu List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:10:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR threads/101355; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Xu To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Cc: Gergely Kovacs , freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads/101355: threaded application spents too much time in _umtx_op with libthr Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 08:00:37 +0800 On Friday 04 August 2006 19:44, Gergely Kovacs wrote: > >Number: 101355 > >Category: threads > >Synopsis: threaded application spents too much time in _umtx_op with > > libthr Confidential: no > >Severity: serious > >Priority: medium > >Responsible: freebsd-threads > >State: open > >Quarter: > >Keywords: > >Date-Required: > >Class: sw-bug > >Submitter-Id: current-users > >Arrival-Date: Fri Aug 04 11:50:09 GMT 2006 > >Closed-Date: > >Last-Modified: > >Originator: Gergely Kovacs > >Release: 6.1-STABLE > >Organization: If your application is malloc hunger, then there is performance problem on 6.x since malloc is protected by single lock, you may try -CURRENT, the malloc was rewritten by Jason Evans on -CURRENT. David Xu