From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr  2 20:55:04 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B57106564A;
	Sat,  2 Apr 2011 20:55:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 65-241-43-5.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8256D14EC79;
	Sat,  2 Apr 2011 20:55:03 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4D978D14.406@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 13:54:44 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110319 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201104021205.p32C5Y8g082718@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20110402155230.GA80090@magic.hamla.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110402155230.GA80090@magic.hamla.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Dirk Meyer <dinoex@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 20:55:04 -0000

On 04/02/2011 08:52, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 12:05:34 +0000, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>
>> dinoex      2011-04-02 12:05:34 UTC
>>
>>    FreeBSD ports repository
>>
>>    Modified files:
>>      graphics/netpbm      Makefile
>>    Log:
>>    - drop CONFLICTS with megetty
>>    Submitted by:   olgeni
>
> Does PORTREVISION need to be bumped when we change CONFLICTS?

When adding CONFLICTS I would say definitely yes, since they are 
recorded in the package. When dropping a conflict I personally would be 
less inclined to bump it, unless I knew that there was an existing 
problem that is being solved by the update.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/