From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 24 15:18: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.wedgev.com (cm57-70.liwest.at [212.33.57.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD90637B422 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 15:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wedge by smtp.wedgev.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (FreeBSD)) id 13dK5v-0003CK-00 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 00:17:59 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 00:17:59 +0200 From: Bernhard Valenti To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ICQ behind natd masquerade Message-ID: <20000925001759.A12280@cipher.home.at> Reply-To: Bernhard Valenti References: <5.0.0.25.2.20000921083515.00a9aad0@10.0.0.55> <969526426.39c9cc9ac0952@webmail.harmonic.co.il> <20000921150843.A12529@cipher.home.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20000921150843.A12529@cipher.home.at>; from bernhard.valenti@gmx.net on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:08:43PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:08:43PM +0200, Bernhard Valenti wrote: > i changed the timeout for UDP to 600 seconds ( i took a look at the linux icq masq module and that uses 600 too ) > in /usr/src/lib/libalias/alias_db.c line 159 > > maybe its possible to only increase the timeout out for icq ? > cause i guess a timeout of 600 can easily flood the table ? changing that timeout didnt help at all. i got several complaints that icq goes offline/online all day long. bernhard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message