Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:17:51 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: "Jason M. Leonard" <fuzz@ldc.upenn.edu> Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware (twe, twa) support for AMD64 in 5.3? Message-ID: <20040908181751.GB32204@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040908092352.T26965@lorax.ldc.upenn.edu> References: <20040905123829.D51907@lorax.ldc.upenn.edu> <6.1.2.0.0.20040905214720.05a7d5b0@193.189.169.9> <20040908092352.T26965@lorax.ldc.upenn.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:51:09AM -0400, Jason M. Leonard wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Sun, 5 Sep 2004, Tomaz Borstnar wrote: >=20 > >At 18:39 5.9.2004, Jason M. Leonard wrote: > >>1. Are the 3ware drivers ready for production on AMD64? > > > >so far twa seem to work OK on 5.3beta. Will test it more extensively in= =20 > >future. >=20 > Thanks. I do have several AMD64 boxes with 3ware 9500 cards. They're al= l=20 > running i386 right now, though, because I bought them based on the fact= =20 > that twa was in the AMD64 GENERIC in -CURRENT at the time. Silly me=20 > not to do my research; twa built fine in -CURRENT, newfs seemed OK,=20 > mounting the volume seemed OK, but anything after that resulted in a=20 > panic. So I read the threads cited in my previous email, smacked myself= =20 > on the head and installed FreeBSD/i386 on those machines. >=20 > But I still wanted a box running FreeBSD/AMD64, so I ordered an all-SCSI= =20 > box with an asr(4)-based SCSI card. Because this time I checked the=20 > hardware release notes for AMD64 and asr(4) was listed. Cool. > > Except, of course, when I tried to install FreeBSD/AMD64 on my new SCSI= =20 > machine I found that asr(4) didn't really work after all. asr(4) is not 64-bit ready. :( I believe aac is. > Now I need to purchase new hardware again, so this time I thought I would= =20 > ask first instead of making another mistake. Since twa(4) seems to be=20 > working for you I'll take down one of the boxes currently running=20 > FreeBSD/i386, install 5.3/AMD64 on it and begin extenstive testing today. twa(4) is supposed to work. I think it's even been tested by 3ware. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBP0zPXY6L6fI4GtQRAoteAJ9KpeD4wyhG0+2RHlK+EJR5N8IeugCdGCOL zhU2kSQG1caNJILtEnM7DBs= =wXo1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040908181751.GB32204>