From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Feb 2 3:36:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1287637B491 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 03:36:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 9271 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Feb 2001 11:34:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:34:46 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Doug Rabson Cc: OKAZAKI Tetsurou , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/graphics/aalib Message-ID: <20010202133446.J328@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Rabson , OKAZAKI Tetsurou , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20010202132926.H328@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from dfr@qubesoft.com on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:34:47AM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:34:47AM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:23:00AM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, OKAZAKI Tetsurou wrote: > > > > > > > True, but this shall indicate to any *potential* C++ users that something > > about the port has changed, and they might even take a peek at the logs > > to see exactly what changed. > > > > There are those like me who run cvsup with -L 2, and then read the output; > > and then there are those who don't :) It's for their benefit that > > PORTREVISION exists - so that pkg_version can tell them that something > > important changed, and they should spend some time wondering exactly what > > it was :) > > So I should increment PORTREVISION? Yes; but I believe nbm already did. G'luck, Peter -- I am not the subject of this sentence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message