Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:25:04 +0100 From: Hugo Silva <hugo@barafranca.com> To: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. Message-ID: <467962F0.9000208@barafranca.com> In-Reply-To: <1182357973.10612.2.camel@localhost> References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1182357973.10612.2.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Evans wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 21:49 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>>> UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. >>>> >>>> >>> Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS >>> for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a >>> >> if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) partition for >> /boot files, ZFS on rest. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > 50MB ? Asking for trouble that is. All I've got is a debug kernel, and a > backup.. > > $ du -sh /boot > 174M /boot > > 22K /boot/defaults 2.0K /boot/firmware 20M /boot/kernel 7.8M /boot/modules 4.0K /boot/zfs 20M /boot/kernel.old 20M /boot/kernel.works 68M /boot/ 68M total Keeping porn on /boot ? So unorthodox! :-) Hugo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?467962F0.9000208>