Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 16:12:11 -0500 From: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: developers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmgr duties expand Message-ID: <20011118161211.A8483@databits.net> In-Reply-To: <20011118204906.F16558@tao.org.uk>; from joe@tao.org.uk on Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 08:49:06PM %2B0000 References: <688520000.1006087432@lobster.originative.co.uk> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011118091926.50181A-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20011118204906.F16558@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[cc: trimmed a bit] ++ 18/11/01 20:49 +0000 - Josef Karthauser: | > In this case, 'ports committer' refers to the right to commit to the ports | > tree only. Although this is not enforced by the CVS scripts, it's easy to | > imagine that it might be in the future. | | There is code there to implement this as of last week. (In the avail | file.) We need to be careful about enforcing this in the scripts. I mean, I'm a ports committer, but I committed to calendar.freebsd in src/, and have added contributors and made the traditional first commits in doc/. I don't think we need this kind of limitation. If we can't trust someone enough to only commit to certain parts of the tree (with the obvious exceptions I pointed out), they probably shouldn't be a committer in the first place. -pete -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011118161211.A8483>