From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 6 10:54:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4920216A41F for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:54:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from thorn.pobox.com (thorn.pobox.com [208.210.124.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0E243D46 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from thorn (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thorn.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C31105; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 05:54:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mappit.local.linnet.org (212-74-113-67.static.dsl.as9105.com [212.74.113.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thorn.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D8F4A1F; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 05:54:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from lists by mappit.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1EupEY-0007do-3m; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:54:10 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:54:10 +0000 From: Brian Candler To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20060106105409.GA29355@uk.tiscali.com> References: <20051230104816.GA1779@webcom.it> <001601c60d86$0a8fe8e0$642a15ac@smiley> <20051230235132.GC1779@webcom.it> <43B5CA24.5030604@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43B5CA24.5030604@samsco.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Andrea Campi , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Darren Pilgrim Subject: Re: sudo in basesystem (was: fetch extension - use local filenamefrom content-disposition header) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:54:16 -0000 On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 05:00:36PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Now, if portupgrade > were written in C or even C++, it would be a no-brainer to import. Does sysutils/portmanager meet the requirements?