From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 10 15: 4:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750C037B422 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:04:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f3AM4GY07890; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:04:16 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Dan Phoenix Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lockf in apache Message-ID: <20010410150416.E15938@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010410131254.V15938@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from dphoenix@bravenet.com on Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:01:05PM -0700 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At a glance the following config should work. If apache is not in 'accept' then you've done something wrong. * Dan Phoenix [010410 15:01] wrote: > > > Ok let's take this for example > > Listen 172.16.0.26:80 > Listen 172.16.6.2:80 > > NameVirtualHost 172.16.0.26:80 > NameVirtualHost 172.16.6.2:80 > > > > .6.2 is real ip for load balancer. > .0.x is for internal use > > so let;s rewrite. > > Bind * > Port 80 > > NameVirtualHost 172.16.0.26 > NameVirtualHost 172.16.6.2 > > > > > this the idea? > not even sure why .0.26 etc was setup tha tis just for internal testing > but a good thing to have...maybe a > NameVirtual * > VirtualHost * > > not sure if i can get away with that....i will play with it for abit.. > let me know if you already know off hand. > reason we even have namevirtualhost is because we have alot of > virtual hosts setup and is required in that case as they all use same ip > address. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message