Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:04:16 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lockf in apache Message-ID: <20010410150416.E15938@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0104101455190.1954-100000@gandalf.bravenet.com>; from dphoenix@bravenet.com on Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:01:05PM -0700 References: <20010410131254.V15938@fw.wintelcom.net> <Pine.BSO.4.21.0104101455190.1954-100000@gandalf.bravenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At a glance the following config should work. If apache is not in 'accept' then you've done something wrong. * Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com> [010410 15:01] wrote: > > > Ok let's take this for example > > Listen 172.16.0.26:80 > Listen 172.16.6.2:80 > > NameVirtualHost 172.16.0.26:80 > NameVirtualHost 172.16.6.2:80 > > <VirtualHost 172.16.0.26:80 172.16.6.2:80> > > .6.2 is real ip for load balancer. > .0.x is for internal use > > so let;s rewrite. > > Bind * > Port 80 > > NameVirtualHost 172.16.0.26 > NameVirtualHost 172.16.6.2 > > <VirtualHost 172.16.6.2> > > > this the idea? > not even sure why .0.26 etc was setup tha tis just for internal testing > but a good thing to have...maybe a > NameVirtual * > VirtualHost * > > not sure if i can get away with that....i will play with it for abit.. > let me know if you already know off hand. > reason we even have namevirtualhost is because we have alot of > virtual hosts setup and is required in that case as they all use same ip > address. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010410150416.E15938>