From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 11:47:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3382A9 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from returns@a.ss34.on9mail.com) Received: from a.ss34.on9mail.com (a.ss34.on9mail.com [209.144.21.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE5AB83 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by a.ss34.on9mail.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 31F3A6C83A1; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:47:28 +0200 (SAST) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Best priced Apartments Message-ID: <1358855248_SectionID-451168_HitID-1358839116229_SiteID-40814_EmailID-8235727_DB-12_SID-14@ss34.on9mail.com> X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://a.ss34.on9mail.com/reportabuse.aspx?stid=40814&hitid=1358839116229&sec=451168&email=freebsd-stable@freebsd.org&EmID=8235727&SID=14&token=7ccbc3fc8abc9e1f6b24be66b854fb247176d7ef DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ss34.on9mail.com; i=@ss34.on9mail.com; q=dns/txt; s=gmmailerd; t=1358855225; h=From; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; l=0; b=S6Hln2H1GRDdq6HdJ5S06ml/xHmqS3mnZ5x8aBnZOPQT5UXs4u4twAdPrxoTgBLIE1wXaymTLNtuHZ8Z7mxYH3Q7b0gjo3ATU/qqmyJYyodm3bp++MBtuwgNpawv+Lh00XvFl0gZstv4goxh8JXMhOJQwoi9Uo+IK8AQ06r2tNM= From: "Just Invest" Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:47:28 +0200 (SAST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:47:40 -0000 =0A=0AMessage sent by: Just Invest From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 12:27:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80976282 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4163DEEB for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TxcxG-0007Cm-KO for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:27:54 +0100 Received: from monat.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.62]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:27:54 +0100 Received: from jsteckli by monat.inf.tu-dresden.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:27:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Julian Stecklina Subject: Re: time issues and ZFS Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:27:24 +0100 Lines: 14 Message-ID: <8738xtwggj.fsf@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> References: <1358780588.32417.414.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <1358783667.32417.434.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: monat.inf.tu-dresden.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vryq8K5rzmYg3MGfrc2pMIo57kY= X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:27:46 -0000 Thus spake Daniel Braniss : > In the meantime here is some info: > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645: running with no problems > LAPIC(600) HPET(450) HPET1(440) HPET2(440) HPET3(440) i8254(100) RTC(0) > > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550: this is the problematic, at least for the moment > HPET(450) HPET1(440) HPET2(440) HPET3(440) LAPIC(400) i8254(100) RTC(0) Does anyone know why the LAPIC is given a lower priority than HPET in this case? If you have an LAPIC, it should always be prefered to HPET, unless something is seriously wrong with it... Julian