From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 18 06:29:00 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA21851 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 06:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA21845 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 06:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id IAA02721; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 08:27:47 -0500 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199610181327.IAA02721@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: SLIP speed To: proff@suburbia.net (Julian Assange) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 08:27:47 -0500 (CDT) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199610181301.XAA27838@suburbia.net> from "Julian Assange" at Oct 18, 96 11:01:26 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Hackers, > > > > > > Could anybody tell me what is the minimum response time on an SLIP > > > or PPP circuit in order to make TELNET works reliable? > > > > Telnet should work fine over just about any reasonable IP connection. > > > > You do want a RTT that is not very large. I personally start to notice > > it when the RTT is > 200ms or so... it just does not keep up very well > > with my typing. > > > > You could probably run SLIP at 2400 baud and get an okay IP connection, > > but telnet would seem very doggy and slow. > > > > ... JG > > Line mode lives! Does anybody care to try 300 or 110 baud IP? :-) ... JG