From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 26 15: 0:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A55E37B401 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 15:00:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from mindspring.com (dialup-209.245.135.64.Dial1.SanJose1.Level3.net [209.245.135.64]) by scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA21210; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 15:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B8971BD.1E028F84@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 15:01:33 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Reply-To: tlambert2@mindspring.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Oliver Fromme , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... References: <20010826015413.C92548@dragon.nuxi.com> <200108261120.NAA07025@lurza.secnetix.de> <20010826140236.A21698@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 01:20:23PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > "Our" csh still behaves differently like any /bin/csh on > > any other system that I know, and can't be easily made to > > behave like them. > > This is an assertion. Where is your supporting evidence? Hit "TAB"? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message