Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:21:04 -0400 From: Jan Knepper <jan@digitaldaemon.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org>, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, Dmitry Salychev <dsl@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The Case for Rust (in any system) Message-ID: <5ee1059e-cc6b-4b75-a568-b06ba3042d2d@digitaldaemon.com> In-Reply-To: <202409090739.4897d92v078621@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <202409082111.488LBTtI074660@critter.freebsd.dk> <202DD893-B152-4B38-AE9B-862E08785396@freebsd.org> <202409090739.4897d92v078621@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/9/24 03:39, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > David Chisnall writes: >> On 8 Sep 2024, at 22:11, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >>> The logical progression of C++ adoption would start with using a C++ >>> compiler as a better C compiler. >> Compiling C as C++ will *normally* give the same output, but not always. > But do you agree that the C++ compiler's take on things make more sense > than the C compiler's in these cases ? > Yes.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5ee1059e-cc6b-4b75-a568-b06ba3042d2d>