From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 17 12:32:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E281065672 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8404C8FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so2429559bwz.13 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:32:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.72.207 with SMTP id n15mr1638468bkj.62.1297945958221; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:32:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w3sm609710bkt.17.2011.02.17.04.32.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:32:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D5D1563.4050807@my.gd> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:32:35 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Evans References: <4D5BF78E.7010306@digsys.bg> <4D5BFCC1.3010404@my.gd> <20110217110230.GB25240@e-Gitt.NET> <4D5D0165.1030000@my.gd> <20110217111010.GC25240@e-Gitt.NET> <4D5D1075.2060708@my.gd> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: LSI SAS 2008 (mfi) on SuperMicro X8SI6-F X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:32:40 -0000 On 2/17/11 1:18 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> What is sad is that these controllers are becoming very mainstream now, >> we're getting them more and more on Dell servers , and the fbsd project >> still struggles with them (for reasons I don't know, might be LSI's >> fault, might be a lack of resources or interest...) >> >> I'm having a very hard time defending the use of fbsd for firewalls at >> work, with the recent release of debian kfreebsd. >> > > Forgive my naïveté, but surely kfreebsd would have precisely the same > issues with the same controllers, since it uses FreeBSD's kernel. Am I > missing something? > > Cheers > > Tom I am not sure, but you make a good point. Don't get me wrong though, I don't mean to offend anyone when I say the fbsd project struggles with this driver. There may very well be very valid reasons like lack of cooperation on LSI's part, I wouldn't know.