From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 22:40:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1518216A41F for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:40:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3D343D46 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB7Me6lf078503 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jB7Me62D078502; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:40:06 GMT Message-Id: <200512072240.jB7Me62D078502@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jung-uk Kim Cc: Subject: Re: kern/89752: [bpf] [patch] bpf_validate() needs to do more checks X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jung-uk Kim List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:40:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/89752; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jung-uk Kim To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, guy@alum.mit.edu Cc: Subject: Re: kern/89752: [bpf] [patch] bpf_validate() needs to do more checks Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:32:31 -0500 It looks good but `bpf_maxbufsize' may be unavailable to other consumers such as ng_bpf(4) and it doesn't make sense to them.