From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 23 09:34:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D4F8F2 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:34:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FA78FC14 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.35.168.59] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1TQaoP-0005aS-I8; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:30:13 +0200 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:18:09 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: dweimer@dweimer.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too! Message-ID: <20121023111809.27a9183f@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20121016101957.GB53800@FreeBSD.org> <20121022174457.GB59689@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/uFhV__nLbWtfyFiJtH66FYf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 Cc: FreeBSD Hackers X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:34:57 -0000 --Sig_/uFhV__nLbWtfyFiJtH66FYf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable dweimer wrote: > On 2012-10-22 12:44, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > Update: > > > > It looks pretty bad so far. Page: > > > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/GoogleCodeIn/2012Tasks > > > > Has 38 tasks so far out of which: > > > > ~30 would qualify. > > > > Consider this e-mail to be the last call for action. Otherwise we'll=20 > > have to > > pull back and concentrate our efforts on GSOC instead. >=20 > One thing I can think to add if it's not already been done and if its a=20 > practical idea for the Google project, would be to update the mount_udf=20 > command to support newer versions of UDF. It looks like as of FreeBSD 7=20 > that 1.02 & 1.50 are supported, I( haven't been able to find any more=20 > recent documentation to support whether or not updates have been made=20 > since then. >=20 > I only know that server I have running 9.0, for the purpose of hosting=20 > ISO images on the network so they are available to our ESX environment=20 > for mounting as a local CDROM/DVD within virtual machines, and also=20 > available as files over a network share, can't mount the some of the=20 > more recent DVDs in the UDF format, but I am unsure which format they=20 > are in, they could be 2.0, 2.5, or 2.6. There's work in progress to port the UDF code from NetBSD: http://wiki.freebsd.org/action/show/SummerOfCode2012/UDFImplementation Oleksandr posted a patch on freebsd-fs@ in July. Fabian --Sig_/uFhV__nLbWtfyFiJtH66FYf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlCGYNUACgkQBYqIVf93VJ2SUgCdFPoqhPESMvJc16/z5pvYBnpm QgAAniyjsfkRxlZrsBq7MN9pxa640wnE =WieV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/uFhV__nLbWtfyFiJtH66FYf--