Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:29:34 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@FreeBSD.org> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Cc: xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFR] Event channel Interrupts and unified Xen interrupt infrastructure. Message-ID: <FD7B1E0C-84A2-454E-8407-7DAC78275598@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <521F9DC5.6040606@freebsd.org> References: <7D29BB74-2341-4164-B2B8-85A4CAB3A6CE@FreeBSD.org> <521F9DC5.6040606@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 08/29/13 09:32, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >> I've been working to get the next chunk of Spectra/Roger Pau Monné Xen work into head. The latest version of the patch I'm working on can be found here: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/xen_intr.diff >> >> I will continue my testing today and commit it tonight unless I hear complaints. Comments, corrections, improvements, and bug reports welcome. > > Could this patch be split into functional and non-functional components? It's > distracting having everything mixed up together in a single megapatch. Even > committing the s/unlikely/__predict_false/ separately would help. It could, but it would delay an already long delayed process in getting this work into the tree. > How do you intend to have Xen HVM work in the GENERIC kernel configuration? > Will you be adding 'options XENHVM' to GENERIC? Yes. -- Justin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FD7B1E0C-84A2-454E-8407-7DAC78275598>