From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 14 14:10:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3633316A41C; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:10:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frode@nordahl.net) Received: from smtp1.powertech.no (smtp1.powertech.no [195.159.0.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB3043D1F; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:10:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frode@nordahl.net) Received: from [195.159.148.126] (dhcp7.xu.nordahl.net [195.159.148.126]) by smtp1.powertech.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C09E8249; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:10:00 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <42AD43F4.1020305@cuk.nu> References: <42AA2B21.8040708@bfoz.net> <42AA761B.5020909@cs.tu-berlin.de> <42AB6EE1.7070405@bfoz.net> <42AD43F4.1020305@cuk.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0BEFEB50-325C-4EE6-BAB6-8FC24ABAEF9B@nordahl.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Frode Nordahl Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:10:00 +0200 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marko_=C4=8Cuk?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS on 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:10:03 -0000 On 13. jun. 2005, at 10.29, Marko =C4=8Cuk wrote: > I have same hardware as before, when 5.3 was installed, except the =20 > installation is new, 5.4. I have NFS mounted and some FTP app is =20 > using it extensively and server crashes once / day. How much memory do you have on the server? You may want to adjust =20 vm.kmem_size_max. I have it set to 419430400 (400MB) on my 2 and 4G RAM servers. I have recently upgraded 5 NFS servers from 5.3-STABLE to 5.4-RELEASE-=20= p2, and have had no ill effects so far. I had frequent crashes on 5.2.x before setting kmem_size_max (it was =20 a compile time option back then), so I have kept it that way since. Frode Nordahl frode@nordahl.net