From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 06:18:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15963AED for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 06:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-x244.google.com (mail-pb0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE87123F9 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 06:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f68.google.com with SMTP id uo5so5144521pbc.3 for ; Sun, 18 May 2014 23:18:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P+UOFZ2ukwsjlk5eOMjGdi3Yymgi9PJpLi4e+gz2Kr8=; b=KQ2FEwUM+KLA9Up4GCzGuycitnUEP40Jv5t21pWs0JrnwlSzPKMpGXJyFKsKMEs+gY mp3ItPx6uKzpqHbcYn0MonP0frr5BuYUXLXKEl33IRtX7VIawAjNXpS3dsGd1I8s3VNc IN0BY7JzJJtfJa+MJrjqipGEqxwTqVlljC7UEbQLlYiAJ9+wv2YNNrojeRyV4VdJ49wm z9I+uRr4wIdybyfp/9cKGRMjoqTc+0ROZaC4i1o0olZmocWd2tVLsf3LHWPfiSYrPdpc VrO7i1m51d8NQ55Zr/KNX4yIO4s3Feh1NVqrpIfA4avNV0qjEhXkdWJ0MniVcNjUq8wU PCzA== X-Received: by 10.67.4.138 with SMTP id ce10mr40064530pad.12.1400480334297; Sun, 18 May 2014 23:18:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (107-146-213-175.res.bhn.net. [107.146.213.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm71117964pat.11.2014.05.18.23.18.52 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 18 May 2014 23:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5379A24E.1050706@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 23:18:54 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openoffice-4 dist file missing; openoffice.org-3 fails to extract References: <537930DE.7010904@dreamchaser.org> <5379776B.3060706@gmail.com> <53797B19.7000304@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <53797B19.7000304@dreamchaser.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 06:18:55 -0000 On 5/18/2014 8:31 PM, Gary Aitken wrote: >>> Trying to build either of these: >>> openoffice-4 >>> openoffice.org-3 >>> >>> For openoffice-4, I get: >>> Requires distfile: ApacheOpenOffice.ext_sources.4.0.1.r1524958.tar.bz2 >>> doesn't seem to exist. >>> It's not clear to me from the build message where >>> ApacheOpenOffice.ext_sources.4.0.1.r1524958.tar.bz2 >>> is supposed to be; >>> I don't see it at >>> ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/openoffice >>> >>> For openoffice.org-3 I get: >>> >>> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by openoffice.org-3.3.0 for building >>> ===> Extracting for openoffice.org-3.3.0 >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for openoffice.org3/OOo_OOO330_m20_source.tar.bz2. >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for openoffice.org3/ext_sources.20110129.tar.bz2. >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for openoffice.org3/unowinreg.dll. >>> tar: Unrecognized archive format >>> tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. >>> *** [do-extract] Error code 1 >>> >>> Has anyone built either of these successfully recently? >>> If so, what's the magic? >> >> Hello, >> >> I also had the same problem, I just went for libreoffice instead. >> I don't know, probably, openoffice ports are depreciating? >> >> Best regards >> ed > I just got a good build using openoffice-devel, which is 4.1.0, and so far > seems to work. I've only crudely tested with calc and writer; can't test the > db stuff until I get a jdk that works. > > Gary Appears openoffice ports are being maintained; I guess it must be a bug then. I'm enjoying libreoffice and I 'm glad to hear the devel-openoffice port is working well. Best regards ed