From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 18:36:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B7316A403; Wed, 16 May 2007 18:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom.hurst@clara.net) Received: from spork.qfe3.net (spork.qfe3.net [212.13.207.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A31613C458; Wed, 16 May 2007 18:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom.hurst@clara.net) Received: from [81.104.144.87] (helo=voi.aagh.net) by spork.qfe3.net with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HoO2F-000Nxm-HD; Wed, 16 May 2007 19:15:39 +0100 Received: from freaky by voi.aagh.net with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HoO27-000GUF-An; Wed, 16 May 2007 19:15:31 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:15:31 +0100 From: Thomas Hurst To: Jack Vogel Message-ID: <20070516181531.GA62119@voi.aagh.net> Mail-Followup-To: Jack Vogel , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-net References: <2a41acea0705161030k40831aa5o168b5bc40fcf3352@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0705161030k40831aa5o168b5bc40fcf3352@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Not much. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: Thomas Hurst Cc: freebsd-net , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: EM and TSO X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:36:51 -0000 * Jack Vogel (jfvogel@gmail.com) wrote: > I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express > adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and > I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll > everyone, do you have a PCI-X adapter and are using TSO without > problems and wish to keep the support in? > > If no one is then I'll just leave it as is. We put CURRENT on one of our Sun X4200's for some MySQL tests a few days ago and haven't noticed any problems, though it's only handled a few million packets so far. Does this change remove support or just disable it by default? -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst http://hur.st/