From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 10:55:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C934E16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:55:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822B643D1F for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:55:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cpressey@catseye.mine.nu) Received: from catseye.biscuit.boo ([207.81.17.215]) by priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.netSMTP <20040125185505.GESQ27216.priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net@catseye.biscuit.boo>; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:55:05 -0700 Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:59:16 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: Richard Schilling Message-Id: <20040125105916.271cddce.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20040125131238.GI309@foghorn.rsmba.biz> References: <20040125131238.GI309@foghorn.rsmba.biz> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Open Source License: Single Supplier Open Source License X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:55:06 -0000 On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 05:12:38 -0800 Richard Schilling wrote: > On 2004.01.24 19:14 Bill Woods wrote: > > And this has what do do with FreeBSD Stable ? > > It's simply a notification that I will be distributing some of my > original works under this license. Since FreeBSD is the mainstay > operating system for me and my company, we forsee at some point to > start releasing new BSD add-ons under this license. There's certainly nothing stopping you from releasing proprietary add-ons for FreeBSD, and making the source for them public, and accepting patches from developers. i.e. There's no reason to become OSI certified to distribute software in the manner that you seem to intend. -Chris