From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 3 20:07:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA15243 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 20:07:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bright.fx.genx.net (bright.fx.genx.net [206.64.4.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA15238 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 20:06:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by bright.fx.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA14308; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 23:10:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bright.fx.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 23:10:08 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@bright.fx.genx.net To: Ronald Kuehn cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic: ffs_blkfree: bad size In-Reply-To: <199812040355.EAA02620@merlin.rz.tu-clausthal.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > dev=0x20404, bno = 13, bsize = 8192, size = 8192, fs = /var > panic: ffs_blkfree: bad size > > The /var filesystem does not have soft updates enabled. > I got a dump, but not from a debugging kernel. > > [ current as of Dec 2 ] Just wondering, why are people running softupdates and non-softupdates on the same box, or just plain not using softupdates? I thought that it is as reliable as regular mounts and faster? Or are there issues that I haven't noticed? Or are you guys testing for the FreeBSD project? -Alfred > > Bye, > Ronald > -- > * The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message