From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 22 10:52:35 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39C416A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 22 Dec 2003 10:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from diaspar.rdsnet.ro (diaspar.rdsnet.ro [213.157.165.224])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B104843D58
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 22 Dec 2003 10:52:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dudu@diaspar.rdsnet.ro)
Received: (qmail 57698 invoked by uid 89); 22 Dec 2003 18:52:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO diaspar.rdsnet.ro)
	(dudu@diaspar.rdsnet.ro@213.157.165.224)
	by 0 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Dec 2003 18:52:34 -0000
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:52:31 +0200
From: Vlad Galu <dudu@diaspar.rdsnet.ro>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <20031222205231.7bad28ab.dudu@diaspar.rdsnet.ro>
In-Reply-To: <20031222184812.87890.qmail@web60808.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20031222184812.87890.qmail@web60808.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="pgp-sha1";
 boundary="Signature=_Mon__22_Dec_2003_20_52_31_+0200_kv.B0LcOf/10LSOt"
Subject: Re: interface bonding
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:52:35 -0000

--Signature=_Mon__22_Dec_2003_20_52_31_+0200_kv.B0LcOf/10LSOt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Richard Bejtlich <richard_bejtlich@yahoo.com> writes:

|Thanks to Dmitry's tip on ng_eiface, I'm happy to
|report using the following configuration to bond
|interfaces with ng_one2many and a virtual interface
|ngeth0.
|

	Thanks for the tip. I have one question, though. Is the throughtput of
the ngeth0 interface equal to the sum of the throughtput on each
physical interface ? During my tests with ng_fec I noticed that the
setup was only capable of failover; it only transferred frames on one
interface. If the interface went down for some reason, it switched to
the other one.


----
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.

--Signature=_Mon__22_Dec_2003_20_52_31_+0200_kv.B0LcOf/10LSOt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/5z1xP5WtpVOrzpcRAkSgAJwPSN5hBjGjY/cAoDX8M4Hbs1S3yQCfXLMh
QFTQM8f0/mtwy4dHu7hDwMs=
=h4BM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Mon__22_Dec_2003_20_52_31_+0200_kv.B0LcOf/10LSOt--