From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 18 11:52:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA10210 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 11:52:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA10202 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 18:52:50 GMT (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA05931 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 19:49:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199804181849.TAA05931@awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: psignal & sys_siglist Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 19:49:18 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Has anyone any reasons for not removing the psignal() and sys_siglist decls in unistd.h ? They also appear in signal.h - the correct place IMHO. A ``make buildworld'' produces no warnings with them removed. -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message