From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Apr 13 0:59:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.249.129.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B96415665; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:59:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA40104; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:56:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199904130756.AAA40104@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Nik Clayton , Charles Henrich , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, Dan Langille , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Charles Henrich a Star? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:49:49 PDT." <58590.923989789@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:56:15 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Nah , lets just be up front, We are the "Cure" for an Internet infested with virus and linux. Don't mind me just playing around. Have Fun Guys, Amancio > > "Movie FX company chooses FreeBSD over Linux for increased reliability" > > Or, even less combatatively: > > "Movie FX company chooses FreeBSD for overall reliability" > > Then in the article you can have a paragraph saying how Linux was > evaluated and FreeBSD chosen instead, even though the renderman binary > was a Linux one. Even if it just states reasons of personal > preference for this, it's fine. Just so long as it's not in the > headline or makes claims that Linux is somehow less reliable in > general (stating a preference is not the same as making bold claims), > we're fine. > > - Jordan > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message