From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 07:21:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0A416A419; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cerny@icomvision.com) Received: from mohinder.icomvision.com (icom.casablanca.cz [81.0.254.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121A413C481; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cerny@icomvision.com) Received: by mohinder.icomvision.com (Postfix, from userid 503) id 0BCCEF19E9; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:03:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:03:56 +0200 From: Marian Cerny To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20070725070356.GA80507@icomvision.com> References: <200706281720.l5SHK9hx098625@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706281720.l5SHK9hx098625@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Gavin Atkinson , freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/70832: [re] serious problems with RealTek NIC using re0 driver on Evo N1015v X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:21:12 -0000 I tried to reproduce those problems on FreeBSD 6.2R. 1. I was not able to reproduce the first problem with sporadic hangs at boot. However I have not tested the laptop for long enough period. 2. I was not able to reproduce the panic on 'halt -p'. This problem seems to be fixed. 3. I WAS able to reproduce the last problem with cvsup & "re0: watchdog timeout". But there is a difference in the behaviour. Now when watchdog timeouts appear on the screen, the network is still usable. The cvsup does not finish successfully. When I tried csup, there also was a problem with watchdog timeouts, however the csup doesn't seem to block itself and it finishes its job successfully. The problems are definitely less serious than in FreeBSD 5.2.1R. Marian Cerny