From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 02:50:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A1B1065674 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 02:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org) Received: from panix.lovett.com (panix.lovett.com [166.84.7.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E98E8FC17 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 02:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r74-192-180-219.htvlcmta01.hnvitx.tl.dh.suddenlink.net ([74.192.180.219] helo=lab.lovett.com) by panix.lovett.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QyxMA-000O7G-0D for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:50:18 +0000 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:50:05 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110831215005.00843ec9@lab.lovett.com> In-Reply-To: <4E5E6B26.4040007@FreeBSD.org> References: <201108301524.p7UFOc6Q008169@fire.js.berklix.net> <4E5D0A77.3070304@FreeBSD.org> <20110831004337.2deb368e@lab.lovett.com> <4E5E6B26.4040007@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/procmail Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:50:19 -0000 On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:11:02 +0200 Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 31.08.2011 07:43, schrieb Ade Lovett: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:06:15 +0200 > > 1. In the context of a FreeBSD port, there is absolutely nothing > > wrong with mail/procmail as it stands. That is to say, it compiles > > and runs on all supported OS releases and architectures. > > Which is insufficient in the light of known design flaws and bugs. Hardly. Unless, of course you have empirical proof that mail/procmail is the only such port that suffers from bugs. > > 3. Particularly when there's no magic tool to convert all > > the .procmailrc's out there to mail/whizzy-new-thing. > > Cleaning up every 7 years or so is a good idea actually. Jolly good. I'll go nuke autoconf-2.13 (January 1999) and automake-1.4 (July 2002). We'll ignore the emacs, xemacs, thunderbird users when their stuff doesn't build any more. > > #3 is the important point. If you do want to send mail/procmail to > > the great bitbucket in the sky, then please provide that magic > > tool. I'm sure lots of folks will be willing to test it for you. > > OK. I've asked that on the courier-maildrop list. Remember, it has to be a complete drop-in replacement. MTA agnostic, handle all the various command line arguments, and be totally backwards compatible. Seriously. Find something more useful to do. -aDe